We have participated on the contest “Subgovernance efficiency analysis”:
Contest proposal: Subgovernances efficiency analysis.
Our work was based on an Excel file (spreadsheet) and unfortunately when we uploaded on google drive, it was very messy. So, before submitting my work, we decided to present our work on the group https://t.me/freeton_analytics first, in order to have the comments of coummunity. We got some complaints mentioning some guys may don’t like to download the file and they prefer online view. Based on the help of @FastSha we finally uploaded our work at online office drive. Here, there is a nice online view and jurors don’t need to download necessiraly. We also announced it at 12 Dec 2020 here:
But, one of jurors has voted us as:
“Can’t accept the submission which recquires downloading”
How can it be acceptable? His comment is totally worng. No need to download. Download is up to the juror and is not necessary.
Although I have a doubt if a rejection should be accounted as 0 point on calculating average point or not, but what is clear on the published results:
unfortunately, the rank of us has been falled from 2 down to 4 due to the vote of this jury. Although it is not very important to me but the work was done by a team (as mentioned on the group and Excel file) and I am responsible to the rewards of my team.
P.S.: Our average point is 5.83 on blockchain but 5 on the table published by SG. Could you please clarify which one is correct? Is there any published rules for calculating the average points, off-chain? I think we need a fixed rule.