Free TON

Contest proposal: Contests Results Interface

Contest proposal:

Contests Results Interface

Short description:

The task is to develop a web interface that displays the results of contests in the form of a resulting table, so that anyone can check the transparency of payments.

Type:

Contest

Contest entry period:

January 25, 11:59 PM UTC - February 8, 23:59 PM UTC.

Voting Cycle:

7 days

Requirements:

  • The web interface must support at least two ranking logics - the standard contest logic (by points) and the Yes / No logic (as in the Jury Selection contest).
  • The code of the solution must be open-source.
  • The interface should have the following functions: displaying a list of jury and participants and their rewards, sorting by score / submission number, interface to setting up prizes manually, the ability to export to excel.
  • The ability to export the results in the form of a “wallet-reward” table to facilitate the process of paying out prizes by SubGovernance.

An example of a similar table - Link

Evaluation criteria and winning conditions:

● The interface should be simple and easy-to-use for an ordinary user.

● All sources must be open-source. Otherwise, the application will be rejected.

● The ability to integrate into existing voting interfaces.

●The visual and functional components of the interface will be evaluated.

Rewards:

Only submissions that receives average score 5 and above will get a chance to get prizes for participation.

1st prize…………………………………………… 20,000 Tons

2nd prize…………………………………………… 15,000 Tons

3rd prize…………………………………………… 10,000 Tons

Runners up from 4th to 10th place ……………… 3,000 Tons

Note: If the number of winning submissions is less than the number of rewards available, any remaining rewards are not subject to distribution and are considered void.

Voting:

  • The juror must have a solid understanding of the described subject in order to provide a score and feedback. If not, the juror should choose to “Abstain”.
  • Jurors or whose team(s) intend to participate in this contest by providing submissions lose their right to vote in this contest.
  • Each juror will vote by rating each submission on a scale of 1 to 10 or can choose to reject it if it does not meet requirements or vote “Abstain” if they feel unqualified to judge.
  • Jurors must provide feedback on submissions or lose their reward.
  • The Jury will reject duplicate, sub-par, incomplete, or inappropriate submissions.
  • The number of days for jury voting is hereby set at X days

Jury rewards:

An amount equal to 15% of the sum total of all total tokens awarded to contest winners will be distributed among jurors who vote and provide feedback. This percentage will be awarded on the following basis:

  • The percentage of tokens awarded to the jury will be distributed based on the number of votes each juror casts. For example, if one juror votes 20 times and another juror votes 5 times, the juror who votes 20 times will get 4 times more tokens than the juror who votes 5 times.
  • Feedback is mandatory in order to collect any rewards.

Procedural requirements:

Accessibility. All submissions must be accessible for the jury to open and view, so please double-check your submission. If the submission is inaccessible or does not fit the criteria described, jurors may reject the submission.

Timing. Contestants must submit their work before the closing of the filing of applications. If not submitted on time, the submission will not count.

Content. Please submit in PDF format. If all or a portion of the original content cannot be in the form of a PDF, simply submit a PDF with links to that original content. Such links must be to files that cannot be edited after this contest is in the voting phase. If the file links are editable after voting, the jury can reject your submission. This is CRUCIAL!

Contact. Each submission must have an identifiable contact that can be matched with your description. If you have not provided a forum description for discussion, then your application should contain links to your online persona, for example, a Telegram ID (preferred) or other direct contact information that can confirm that the submitted work is yours. In the absence of confirmation by the contestant of the authorship of the submitted work, the submission is rejected.

Multiple submissions

  • Each contestant has the right to provide several submissions if they are all different from one another. If they are too similar, or in any way appear to be partially the same work done twice, or if they appear to be one whole body of work divided into parts to create several submissions, jurors have the right to reject such submissions.
  • If the contestant wants to make an additional submission to replace a previously published submission, the contestant must inform the jury about this fact and indicate which submission is the one to be judged. In this case, only the indicated work will count. If the contestant fails to indicate which submission to judge, only the first submission made will count. The Jury will reject all others.

Estimated budget: 66000 + 0,15*66000 = 75900 TONs

10 Likes

Useful contest. I only have one question: why do you need an interface feature to setting up prizes manually? It’s better when everything is automated

1 Like

Will there be any minimum score which participant should have to get reward?
For example, if participant will get 3,6 average and will get 7th prize will he get his reward? Or participant must gain, for example, minimum 6 average score?

1 Like

In my opinion, the reward for places 4-10 (1,000 tons), as opposed to the rewards for place 3 (10,000 tons), is not well scaled, and so I propose a redesign for that:

such as:

1st prize…………………………………………… 20,000 Tons
2nd prize…………………………………………… 15,000 Tons
3rd prize…………………………………………… 10,000 Tons
Runners up from 4th to10th place ……………… 2,500 Tons

or:

1st prize…………………………………………… 20,000 Tons
2nd prize…………………………………………… 15,000 Tons
3rd prize…………………………………………… 10,000 Tons
4th-6th …………………………………………… 5,000 Tons
Runners up from 7th to10th place ……………… 1,000 Tons

or even if we prefer total rewards doesn’t increase, we can consider:

1st prize…………………………………………… 15,000 Tons
2nd prize…………………………………………… 10,000 Tons
3rd prize…………………………………………… 5,000 Tons
Runners up from 4th to10th place ……………… 2,500 Tons

3 Likes

Useful contest. I only have one question: why do you need an interface feature to setting up prizes manually? It’s better when everything is automated

You cannot set a prize grid in current smart-contracts. Therefore, the prize grid should be taken from the PDF. In the future, there will be contracts in which you can set prizes, but now there is no such option.

So, we need to add an option to set up prizes manually in interface, to be able to work with old contests, based on contracts without prize grid.

1 Like

Will there be any minimum score which participant should have to get reward?
For example, if participant will get 3,6 average and will get 7th prize will he get his reward? Or participant must gain, for example, minimum 6 average score?

Good point. I think that 5 point threshold will be ok.

3 Likes

Great!) You should add it to rules

1 Like

Thanks for the clarification :handshake:

I also support this comment

It should go to DGO subgovernance. I am sure you are aware that the current contest system will be completely redesigned in the next couple of months in the DGO subgov. I do not think community need to support additional work on the current governance process.

1 Like

There should be more amount rewards for first 3 top places cause for developing such interface need to use several specialists who can work with smart-contracts and web-design.
IMHO first places rewards should have such prizes:
1st prize…………………………………………… 30,000 Tons
2nd prize…………………………………………… 25,000 Tons
3rd prize…………………………………………… 20,000 Tons

Ну что вы говорите, это же не конкурс рождественских открыток, тут таких наград не бывает

2 Likes