Whenever we’re talking about an open and decentralised blockchain ecosystem, community is always under consideration.
In Free TON I’m consistently analysing that community doesn’t meant for main governance and they’re taking all decisions on their own feet by bypassing the community discussions on the forum drastically.
7 Million TON Crystals Scam (Fixed).
Funding to cointelegraph opposed to community alerts .
Fake Members Subgovernance and all of them are inactive since then. (600,000 TON Crystals Scam)
Passed Indian Subcontinent Governance with inactive initial members.
- Selection of main governance members should be carried out directly from the community and even through community voting.
- Every community member should have equal rights to vote for main governance members selection.
- All proposals should go through a soft community voting on the forum before final voting on the main governance.
Note: Community will follow and obey a governance that’ll be selected by the community unanimously and it’ll be big mistake for community to follow some greedy stuffs to enable them for a community harassment.