Guys. Please keep in mind that the up front 50K is for implementation based on a CONTEST THEY WON! They are owed those tokens. So to come up with a partnership against those tokens is actually a gesture of good will and not an “ask”. On the contrary to most negative comments, this actually shows a willingness to participate and grow with the network and not just grab tokens. Please keep this in mind. They will get their 50K regardless.
The rest of the tokens are clearly marked on a per user basis, so if they don’t get the users they won’t see the TONs. Not to mention that they are doing this on a 1-to-1 basis (where other partnerships did it on 4-to-1 and sometimes 5-to-1). I don’t know about anyone else, but this seems quite fair and balanced, so there’s no reason for the numbers to scare anyone. As long as they provide a way to verify without any doubts that the users are real and were brought, what’s the issue?
Having said that, I would like to urge Koshelek to make absolutely sure that when you present user KPIs that they be easily verifiable so the community can make an absolutely 100% confirmation that the users are real. Maybe add that into your proposal. Barring that, I think this is a good proposal.
There is of course another route. They can take the 50K, do the integration, and then partner up through PartnerTrack: Idea for onboarding & supporting partners, Broxus acts as an angel
That’s another route to take.