Edited permission. Post against rules!
What’s the conclusion?
Could you clarify, please:
- What is the purpose of this series of phrases? I can’t even call it coherent text.
- What is this post about? What is the conclusion?
Also I found the obvious logical errors here.
And why? Do you think the next phrase could be a proof?
In what strange logic?
First of all, it is not true. Free TON is entirely based on the telegram network design as it still uses the same open sourced code for C++ nodes.
Secondly, even if there were some differences, it does not prove that these differences worsen the protocol and make Free TON less competitive.
P.S. And I think if you were interested in the scope of development that is already done and currently underway, you would not call Free TON a “fun” project.
P.P.S. FYI: Free TON is spelled separately.
No result of the post, the suggestion is deleted.
And what is the purpose of all this?
Final message! TON can achieve more than 1M TPS, but freeTON can do less than 10k TPS. What is the point to support this network if Ethereum 2.0, Cardano, or Solan have a better benchmark?
Free TON is also a centralised network totally controlled by its initial members. They are just giving TON to their partner friends and voice of community is also ignored.
In any open community controlled blockchain network only contribution is important but in Free TON even Jury Members Feedback can be ignored. Here is the proof of Voting Manipulation.
According to the rule and jury members feedback contribution is more important but some jury members started pressurizing other jury members to change their feedback.
Free TON is a centralised network with a central control. Community haven’t any value for Free TON.
Maybe can you tell community about your fraud manipulations in Wiki contest, eh?)))
Seems like even don’t know anything about Free TON ecosystem:man_facepalming:
Contribution and motivation matters at the most in a free network.
тебя забыли спросить, скамер
We have a lot of different subgovernances. This means we don’t have “a central control” and we are decentralised enough. And we’re preparing to switch to SMV 2.0 which gives us complete decentralisation.
Free TON is a community. Right now, the initial members of any subgovernance are usually the most active part of the our community. Their list is not fixed, it can be changed. And you too can become one of them if you contribute for some time.
I studied your links.
You should respect the rules that are accepted by the majority in your subgovernance. If you want to change them, you must first initiate a vote among the community members. In any case, the agreements should not be violated, because cheating is not accepted as a worthy behavior in any society.
Proposal that you are referring to is accepted by the major part of the SG. And it’s fair enough for me as you can “re-submit the corresponding submissions to the next WRC and re-claim reward for the same work”. So honestly, I don’t see any reason for you to complain.
Please check the initial members of below linked subgovernance and then tell me about their activeness because these initial members haven’t even a forum account. We can’t call them active members of Free TON Community.