This topic is reserved for the TRC-7 Non-Fungible Tokens standard.
What is the difference with TIP-31 Non Fungible Tokens and their Collections ?
Main differences will be versatile media storage (including external or on-chain) and the concept of having “one NFT = one contract” design.
I will post the details when I finish writing the draft.
Shouldn’t TIPs have sequential ids? Why we already had TIP-31 and new TIP is #9?
This is because we didn’t have an agreement on the naming convention. Now we have it: all standard extensions should be published in format
TIP-<NUMBER OF THE ORIGINAL STANDARD>/<EXTENSION NUMBER>, e.g. TIP-3/1.
I already asked everyone to refactor their proposals so that the numeration follows this convention.